Sunday, 30 August 2009

Keep your friends close & your enemies closer.

Jenny Hjul Rant or Comment?
One of the perverse things I enjoy about Sundays is reading Jenny Hjul
. Don't get my wrong, I cannot abide the women's views; however, after reading her vitriol I always feel that little more awake. This week was no exception. Although, it took me slightly longer than normal to find Jenny's musings. This weeks article 'It's down to Scottish voters to pass judgement on Lockerbie' was nowhere to be found on timesonline . I was faced with a dilemma: To buy or not to buy? I stopped buying the times months ago because I was becoming so angry at their lazy and aggressively anti-Scotland reporting, but I am having a carpet laid later this week and needed newspaper to line the floor (the Sunday Times does come with at least 10 sections giving plenty cover for the floor and extra for the litter tray). So in the end curiosity (and my willingness to recycle) got the better of me. Jenny did not disappoint.
The article is selective in the use of evidence, speculative and found her conclusions wanting. She does not provide us with anything original instead raises lots of questions designed at undermining the Scottish Government without ever really answering them. She suggests that Brown's government have let 'the Scots squirm alone in the growing international opprobrium'. I do not agree with Brown's silence over the issue, however, I would not describe the Scots as squirming. Far from it. I think the Scottish Executive, generally, and Kenny MacAskill specifically, have handled themselves with dignity. As for 'international opprobrium' should that not read 'selective American opprobrium' - from what I have read the majority of the international community have been sympathetic to the decision
. I am surprised that a "journalist" of Jenny's stature should be so narrow in her world view. She also suggests, based on the reporting of The Times today over the leaked Jack Straw letters, that 'both governments had something to gain from the terrorist's repatriation'. Whilst she is clear over what Westminster gains she fails to fully highlight the 'advantages' for Scotland or the Scottish government. Unless of course she is trying to suggest that the Scottish Government thought that this would advance the 'separatist cause'. I am not a politician or involved in the world of politics but I would like to presume that any political party thinking of making a decision like this on the basis of political advantage would have the sense to research the issue first. Surely, the Scottish Government would have commissioned an opinion poll which, if we are to believe the BBC poll this week, suggesting 2/3 of Scots opposed the release, and the poll which Hjul refers to in this article, showing support for independence has dropped, would have shown limited advantage for the SNP? We should not forget that it was not the SNP who politicised this issue, rather it has been the opposition parties in Scotland and the media who have used this as another opportunity to attack the Nationalists (who incidentally, in another poll published this weekend seemed to have increased their support both in Holyrood & Westminster elections).
Jenny continues to undermine the Scottish government by claiming that 'it seems increasingly unfeasible that Scotland could be in this deep on its own' and 'this has not been a good fortnight for Scottish nationalism or for Salmonds pretensions to statesmanship'.
Jenny's articles increasingly appear to have only one purpose and that is to undermine the SNP administration. It is a weekly rant against everything and anything the SNP does, and her intolerance of Salmond is hardly subtle. Why do I continue to want to read her - well 'keep your friends close and your enemies closer' so they say!
Was it £2 well spent - hardly! But, at least I have the satisfaction of wiping my feet over her on a daily basis.


  1. Jenny takes the thirty pieces of silver every week its very very easy money. No integrity, conscience or "moral compass" Product of Thatcher

  2. J,

    The Times is, as you opine, trying to undermine the Scottish GOVERMENT. I canny stand J Hjul or her diatribe, she is completely out of touch with Scottish Opinion, but then she is "connected" by being married to some Unionist.

    The EBC is the same, look at any picture of Alec Salmond last week on the online Scotland news and he is portrayed as a foaming, ranting, pointing, overweight and paranoid Scot.

    It's the same with news reports on the EBC and you'll notice on Bump Gums with Brian he is torn to shreds for his EBC opinion on one of the threads.

    Welcome to the Blogosphere, I look forward to reading and debating many incisive articles here in my own mad way!

    Welcome home,

    Crazy Daisy

  3. It's all symptomatic of the disjointed, but not disorganised, unionist front against the rise of the SNP. They all came together the other day and ran roughshod over our legal system, politicising an issue, because it allowed them to attack the SNP, that disgraceful show of unionist rhetoric, smoke screens and hypocricy shows the level of fear in the unionist camp.

    Their next big get-together will be when they decide that we, the electorate, can't be trusted to vote in a referendum on our future as a Nation. They're running scared and the tactics will get dirtier as 2010 approaches, I hope that the SNP are up to the challenge.

    PS, welcome to blog land

  4. Thanks for the comments and for the warm welcome to the blogosphere!

    NorrieMac: That attitude is now endemic of the media in this country!

    Crazy Daisy: The BBC's bias against the SNP is so blatant it is comical. Even on International issues the BBC's reporting is questionable and I would rather read Al Jazeera or France 24. The BBC is increasingly becoming a tool for the government disguising itself through its reputation of impartiality.

    Dougie: The political integrity of the opposition in this country is disgusting. It would be a travesty of the democratic process if the electorate were not given the right to choose.

  5. That's one way to keep your enemies close; putting them under the carpet and walking all over them;¬) Good Moniker.